<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The HTC &#8220;Dream&#8221; is one butt-ugly device</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bitbubble.wordpress.com/2008/08/31/the-htc-dream-is-one-butt-ugly-device/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bitbubble.wordpress.com/2008/08/31/the-htc-dream-is-one-butt-ugly-device/</link>
	<description>how (not) to live and work in Silicon Valley.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 13:12:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cell Me a Phone &#171; Changing Way</title>
		<link>http://bitbubble.wordpress.com/2008/08/31/the-htc-dream-is-one-butt-ugly-device/#comment-3847</link>
		<dc:creator>Cell Me a Phone &#171; Changing Way</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 05:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbubble.wordpress.com/?p=271#comment-3847</guid>
		<description>[...] But I think that I&#8217;ll hold off until next year. That thought is reinforced by arguments such as: the first Android phone is primarily a novelty. I&#8217;ll add that the HTC Dream is novel in its ugliness. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But I think that I&#8217;ll hold off until next year. That thought is reinforced by arguments such as: the first Android phone is primarily a novelty. I&#8217;ll add that the HTC Dream is novel in its ugliness. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saumil Mehta</title>
		<link>http://bitbubble.wordpress.com/2008/08/31/the-htc-dream-is-one-butt-ugly-device/#comment-3767</link>
		<dc:creator>Saumil Mehta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 06:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbubble.wordpress.com/?p=271#comment-3767</guid>
		<description>Agreed! I honestly am not going to be a believer in Android until I see a device that kicks ass. HTC devices need not apply. 

I&#039;m not going to hitch my wagon 100% to Apple and think that someone else could come in and build a great device. Just not the HTC Dream.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed! I honestly am not going to be a believer in Android until I see a device that kicks ass. HTC devices need not apply. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not going to hitch my wagon 100% to Apple and think that someone else could come in and build a great device. Just not the HTC Dream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cesar A. Rodriguez</title>
		<link>http://bitbubble.wordpress.com/2008/08/31/the-htc-dream-is-one-butt-ugly-device/#comment-3765</link>
		<dc:creator>Cesar A. Rodriguez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 05:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbubble.wordpress.com/?p=271#comment-3765</guid>
		<description>I wonder if handheld computers will be better suited for the Apple approach of in-house development of both hardware and software versus the Wintel/Dell approach of cooperating but independent hardware and software companies.  The latter approach won the PC game.  The Wintel/Dell approach was extremely efficient at producing inexpensive ugly boxes that sat under our desk.  Handheld computers are completely different.  We carry them with us.  Most human beings want attractive items on their body.  This makes beauty a high priority.  Apple can more easily deliver beauty.  Wintel/Dell and now Google/ARM/Telco approach may not be able to deliver in this new arena.  It&#039;ll be interesting to see how this game plays out...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if handheld computers will be better suited for the Apple approach of in-house development of both hardware and software versus the Wintel/Dell approach of cooperating but independent hardware and software companies.  The latter approach won the PC game.  The Wintel/Dell approach was extremely efficient at producing inexpensive ugly boxes that sat under our desk.  Handheld computers are completely different.  We carry them with us.  Most human beings want attractive items on their body.  This makes beauty a high priority.  Apple can more easily deliver beauty.  Wintel/Dell and now Google/ARM/Telco approach may not be able to deliver in this new arena.  It&#8217;ll be interesting to see how this game plays out&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cesar A. Rodriguez</title>
		<link>http://bitbubble.wordpress.com/2008/08/31/the-htc-dream-is-one-butt-ugly-device/#comment-3764</link>
		<dc:creator>Cesar A. Rodriguez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 05:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbubble.wordpress.com/?p=271#comment-3764</guid>
		<description>Butt-ugly is an understatement...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Butt-ugly is an understatement&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
